Beyond Africanism: A Critique of Joshua Ngoma’s Book “The Rise of the Africans”

 Munshya wa Munshya

“Unless the lions learn how to write”, asserts author Joshua Ngoma, “the hunters will always write their stories.” With this Kenyan proverb, Ngoma begins his 138-page book The Rise of the Africans (2012, Seaburn Publishing). This book, among other things, explains the four principles that Africans should coalesce around to ensure the inevitable and imminent rise of their continent. These pillars are not new. Ghanaian Kwame Nkrumah was among the first to espouse them. These ideals formed the basis for what would later become the rallying cry of Pan-Africanism. Other African leaders and academicians parroted these ideals as well. It is, therefore, quite interesting that half a century later, Ngoma would still find these ideas relevant.

Author Joshua Ngoma

Author Joshua Ngoma

Ngoma is telling a story from his own perspective and the perspective of many Africans. We must all find this positively praiseworthy as a way to begin a conversation on important issues affecting our continent. The author explains African history in a clear and concise manner. He also attempts to explain difficulties Africa faces. Ngoma also deals with the hopes and dreams of Africa’s one billion people. In this book, we see the important imprint of his father, his friends and his brief involved in Zambian politics. He has also done well to do some comparative analysis of both Africa and Asia. His research is impeccable. Certainly, Ngoma’s passion for Africa is unquestionably sizzling.

However, we must join a conversation he has started. For the most part, the four pillars he is espousing as the foundation to direct Africa’s rise have now been discredited. Nkrumahism is no longer defensible. The basic foundation of Pan-Africanism, the perspective from which Ngoma writes, is no longer relevant to 21st century Africa. Africa does not need ideals predicated by futile Pan-Africanist doctrines. Africa needs newer and fresher outlook on its role in the global village. Having been frustrated with pan-Africanism, we must go beyond it and perhaps coalesce around post-Africanism (see Denis Ekpo). Post-Africanism seeks to redeem the African from the illusion of comparison. It interrogates the cracks in the shaky foundations of pan-Africanism. It sees no reason why Africa’s development should be predicated upon definitions imposed by the very people she claims to be free from.

Cecil Rhodes is the patron saint of Pan-Africanism

Cecil Rhodes is the patron saint of Pan-Africanism

The fear of Imperialism?

The first of the four pillars is predicated on the idea that there should be a new Africa, independent and absolutely free from imperialism, organized on a continental scale”. This does sound very good and attractive. However, it is rhetoric loaded with no practical value. As an ideological pillar it flops very miserably. In modern Africa, the Africanists and the Pan-Africanists would like us to believe that European imperialism is Africa’s number one enemy. This might have been the case in 1960 but it is certainly no longer the case. Africa must bury an incessant obsession with the fear of imperialists. Modern Africa cannot claim to be free while at the same time being possessed by an irrational paranoia of the motives of the White skin. I see no connection, whatsoever, between Mugabe’s fear of Europe with his desire to assault his political enemy Tsvangarai using state police. I just do not see the connection between imperialism and the senseless killing going on in Juba, South Sudan today. It would be ridiculous to claim that all the problems in Africa are as a result of the imperialists. Is it the imperialists spending on Zuma’s Nkandla estate? What about the arbitrary arrests of Zambians for possessing Vermox? Is it an imperialist move too?

A modern African is not going to tolerate the nonsense of the fear of imperialism as a way for African leaders to deny basic liberties to the people of Africa. The blame game should end, and Africa should take responsibility.

The idea that Africa must be one and united is perhaps the greatest falsehood Africa has inherited from the colonialist. - Munshya wa Munshya

The idea that Africa must be one and united is perhaps the greatest falsehood Africa has inherited from the colonialist. – Munshya wa Munshya

One and United Africa?

This then should bring me to my next objection to Ngoma’s Africanism: the idea that Africa must be organized on a continental scale, founded upon the “conception of a One and United Africa”. The idea that Africa must be one and united is perhaps the greatest falsehood Africa has inherited from the colonialist. The Africans, themselves, never conceived a united Africa and they never needed to. It was a zygote of European imperialism. It is Cecil Rhodes and King Leopold II who hallucinated of a united Africa “from Cape to Cairo.” For one thing, a united Africa was and still is, far easier to exploit than independent states. Africa as discovered by the colonialist was too volatile to colonize. It had to take some form of “unity” to easily exploit African resources and the Africans themselves. Before Africa jumps on this united Africa bandwagon, we need to ask ourselves how we came to believe that we must be one and united. Africa is not a country and should never be one. We were never meant to be a country. As stated by Ngoma himself, Africa is a complex continent with different cultures and countries. How then did he come to conclude that a united Africa is in Africans’ best interest?

An African science and technology?

The third, pillar is indeed powerful. Africa must draw its strength from modern science and technology. It is quite interesting though that the first casualty of African independence was science and technology. Ngoma highlights the importance of science to the development of Africa. But what he needed to stress even more is the fact that personal apprenticeship is the only way we can actualize the strength of science and technology. To have this strength, Africans do not need to reinvent the wheels of science. Africans must learn from those with strengths in science and technology. This is what Africa needed. But instead of keeping the European innovators in Africa, most of these so called founding fathers of Africa, hounded away Europeans and claimed that they would instead grow their own indigenous “science and technology”. This was disaster, and it showed. Within the decade of independence Kaunda “Zambianized” and “Africanized” by giving crucial science and technology positions to our people who had no clue about science and technology. That is not the way to grow innovation. In a globalized world, innovation in science and technology belongs to everybody. No one country should regard themselves as inferior simply because they have borrowed or stolen technology from others. As noted by Ngoma himself, South Korea is what it is today due to its liberal use of Western technology and patents. Africans must admit that the 1970s and 1980s folly of chasing Whites out of Africa was unreasonable and was a direct attack on Africa’s own opportunity for innovation. Africa needs to be freed from this belief that in order for us to have value, we must make better and newer discoveries than Westerners. Borrowing from Denis Ekpo (2005), there is no need for an African formula for making cement if a Germany has already discovered one. And copying this cement formula from Germany is not a sign that Africa is weak!

The individual and the Community

The fourth pillar should be challenged as well. How did Africa come to believe the idea that “the free development of each individual is conditioned by the free development of all”? What does this even mean? Post-Africanism challenges the misunderstood idea that to the African the individual is not as important as the community. Africans must come to an understanding that they are a “person” first before they become a community of “persons”.

The Rise of The Africans by Joshua Ngoma

The Rise of The Africans by Joshua Ngoma

Africa has been misunderstood as loving community so much as to obliterate the personal value of an individual. The idea that a human being, as a single African being, is important and has personal value should be the bedrock of African development. It is individuals that form a community and not a community the individual. People should not be used as sacrifices at the altar of an abstract nation-state or community; rather it is the individuals whose value should predicate community vision and value. A Post-African society takes the view that Africa must respect the person in order to sustain the community.

Ngoma has started a worthy conversation. I have joined in it. And I hope that many Zambians and other Africans will buy his book and read for themselves why Africa should rise. For me, however, Post-Africanism is newer and fresher to help Africa’s rise. The era of pan-Africanism is over.

Advertisements

8 comments

  • has information on automated timekeeping, webclocks, swipeclocks, online payroll submission that their restaurant clients use to save time and money, and stay within budget.
    Article Source: Steakhouse is regarded as the
    best biffrestaurant oslo. Perhaps the most difficult aspect of taking a plunge into the restaurant business
    is obtaining adequate funding for the endeavor.

    Like

  • To setup, the coach will climb onto a chair on one side with the
    net, holding the ball in numerous positions, simulating
    a ball traveling within the net. Certainly Seal Beach
    can make anyone’s list from the best beaches around Anaheim.
    Usually, there is really a net along with the ball has to
    be pushed while using fists in the air and.

    Like

  • I was curious if you ever thought of changing
    the layout of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people
    could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2
    images. Maybe you could space it out better?

    Like

  • Hello, I enjoy reading all of your post. I wanted to write a
    little comment to support you.

    Like

  • Decolonization of the mind is the key to Zambia’s (and Africa’s for that matter) advancement in all spheres of development. What does this entail?

    It entails getting rid of that ever present inferiority complex. Given the right tools and circumstances, we as smart, as capable as the next guy. All we need is to make conditions conducive for science and technology to thrive whether they are home grown or imported. There is no reason why we don’t have a nshima maker.There is no reason why we don’t have Masuku wine.

    It entails understanding the white man (or Asian). First and foremost he is in African not because he loves us. He is there to advance his own interest. This is not necessarily a bad thing. We should work with him to advance our own interests. This is one area we have failed miserably, we are prone to saying “yes” without inserting clauses that advance our interests, into the agreements that we sign. Then we cry foul after the fact. We need to learn how to play hard ball!

    Like

  • inferiority complex is what africans suffer from,we might want to pretend as tho imperialists are not holding us hostage but its only true e.g zimbabwe even just zambia and that has made our leaders use that as an excuse esp that we all want to have blanket democracies of europe and USA..africans must wake up and stop trying to be like the world o global village esp that deep our throts we know they dont care..you might want to talk about juba but we all know whose behind that esp that their propaganda is now calling for another breakaway in the souuth tis high time africans stoped bin gulibles and started thinkin with our heads,lets put the interests of future generations first not pleasing imperialist just to fit in!

    Like

  • In the modern world, owning productive resources in another country is not “imperialism.” It is investment… Zambian owned copper as ZCCM and we know what we did with it… so refraiming western investment in Africa as imperialism just confirms the african’s paranoia about the white man’s motives.

    But ironically, the black man partners better with the white man than with the fellow black man?!!!

    This is a nice piece Munshya.

    Like

  • Imperialism in the sense that imperialists still control our resources and own our economies even though they are not physically here. That’s why he said that’s our biggests challange which I see you clearly missed. Even the biggest problems Zimbabwe is facing are because of sanctions imposed by Western and European imperialists.
    On one Africa, he doesn’t necessarily mean Africa as a country but we should be more United as Africans. Especially trade between us. There are alarmingly low levels of economic partnerships between African countries but many between African countries and non Africans. I think he tries to stress that Africa should come together man
    When are you returning to Zambia? I’m sure when you return, you will understand

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s